引用本文
  • 马 强,步晓秋,沈 雷,等.经胸锁乳突肌肌间入路行单侧甲状腺癌根治术的临床价值[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2023,44(5):666-670.    [点击复制]
  • MA Qiang,BU Xiaoqiu,SHEN Lei,et al.The feasibility and safety of sternocleidomastoid intermuscular approach in unilateral radical thyroidectomy[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2023,44(5):666-670.   [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 32次   下载 24 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
经胸锁乳突肌肌间入路行单侧甲状腺癌根治术的临床价值
马强,步晓秋,沈雷,梁春立
0
(同济大学附属东方医院甲状腺外科,上海 200120)
摘要:
目的 探究经胸锁乳突肌肌间入路(sternocleidomastoid intermuscular approach, SMIA)行单侧甲状腺癌根治术的可行性和安全性。方法 回顾性分析2021年1月—2022年8月在同济大学附属东方医院收治的80例单侧甲状腺癌患者;其中观察组行SMIA手术(40例),对照组行经常规颈白线入路手术(40例)。比较两组患者基本情况、术中观察指标、术后恢复情况。结果 两组患者在年龄、性别、癌灶直径、手术时间、术中出血量、中央组淋巴结清扫数目、术后甲状旁腺激素水平、术后引流量以及术后并发症方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者在切口隐蔽满意度、颈部麻木牵拉感、Vancouver瘢痕评定量表评分结果有明显差异(P<0.05)。结论 与常规经颈白线入路相比,SMIA行单侧甲状腺癌根治术,在不影响手术效果的前提下,患者切口位置更加隐蔽、术后颈部麻木牵拉感更轻,切口更加美观,是安全可行、值得临床推广的一种手术方式。
关键词:  经胸锁乳突肌肌间入路  经颈白线入路  单侧甲状腺癌根治术  临床应用
DOI:10.12289/j.issn.1008-0392.22487
投稿时间:2022-12-13
基金项目:
The feasibility and safety of sternocleidomastoid intermuscular approach in unilateral radical thyroidectomy
MA Qiang,BU Xiaoqiu,SHEN Lei,LIANG Chunli
(Department of Thyroid Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China)
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sternocleidomastoid intermuscular approach(SMIA) in unilateral radical thyroidectomy. Methods Clinical data of 80 patients who underwent unilateral radical thyroidectomy in East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine from January 2021 to August 2022 were analyzed retrospectively, including 40 cases with SMIA(SMIA group) and 40 cases with conventional linea alba cervicalis approach(control group). The basic information, intraoperative indicators and postoperative outcomes were compared between two groups. Results There was no significant differences in the age, sex, tumor size, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of central lymph node compartment dissection, postoperative PTH level, postoperative drainage volume and incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05). The satisfaction of incision concealment was better, cervical numbness and traction was less, and the score of Vancouver Scar Scale(VSS) was lower in SMIA group than those in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the linea alba cervicalis approach, radical thyroidectomy through SMIA has similar surgery effect, but has more hidden incision, less postoperative cervical traction discomfort and better aesthetics, indicating that SMIA is safe and feasible for clinical application.
Key words:  sternocleidomastoid intermuscular approach  linea alba cervicalis approach  unilateral radical thyroidectomy  clinical application

您是第4634423位访问者
版权所有《同济大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
主管单位:教育部 主办单位:同济大学
地  址: 上海四平路1239号 邮编:200092 电话:021-65980705 E-mail: yxxb@tongji.edu.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计