引用本文
  • 徐婷婷,张峰,张雪丽,等.定量动态增强磁共振成像预测乳腺癌分子亚型的价值[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2017,38(3):50-55.    [点击复制]
  • XU Ting-ting,ZHANG Feng,ZHANG Xue-li,et al.Association between quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI and molecular subtypes of breast cancer[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2017,38(3):50-55.   [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 801次   下载 632 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
定量动态增强磁共振成像预测乳腺癌分子亚型的价值
徐婷婷,张峰,张雪丽,万丽娣,华婷,汤光宇
0
(同济大学附属第十人民医院放射科,上海 200072)
摘要:
目的 研究乳腺癌动态增强磁共振成像(dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, DCE-MRI)定量参数与其分子分型的相关性。方法 回顾性分析经手术病理证实102例不同分子亚型乳腺癌DCE-MRI定量参数,包括容量转移常数(Ktrans)、速率常数(Kep)和血管外细胞外间隙容积比(Ve)。记录瘤体免疫组织化学的雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人类表皮生长因子受体-2(HER-2)及Ki67的表达情况,比较不同分子分型乳腺癌DCE-MRI定量参数的差异,分析生物学预后因子表达与DCE-MRI定参数的相关性。结果 不同分子亚型乳腺癌的DCE-MRI定量参数(Ktrans、Kep、Ve)差异没有统计学意义(H=5.416,P=0.175;H=4.926,P=0.177;H=4.203,P=0.240);ER、PR阴性组的Ktrans及Kep值高于ER、PR阳性组;HER2阳性组的Kep值高于HER2阴性组(P<0.05),但二组间的Ktrans值、Ve值及ADC值差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);Ki67高表达组的Ktrans、Kep值均高于Ki67低表达组。结论 乳腺癌DCE-MRI定量参数不能预测乳腺癌分子亚型,但部分定量参数与预后因子(ER、PR、HER2、Ki67)表达有相关性;Ktrans、Kep值可以反映乳腺癌的生物学行为,有助于评估乳腺癌预后。
关键词:  动态增强磁共振成像  预后因子  定量参数
DOI:10.16118/j.1008-0392.2017.03.010
投稿时间:2017-01-22
基金项目:
Association between quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI and molecular subtypes of breast cancer
XU Ting-ting,ZHANG Feng,ZHANG Xue-li,WAN Li-di,HUA Ting,TANG Guang-yu
(Dept. of Radiology, Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China)
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the association between quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and molecular subtypes of breast cancers. Methods The DCE-MRI findings were retrospectively analyzed in 102 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer. The volume transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep) and volume of EES per unit volume of tissue (Ve) value were calculated. The immunohistochemistry results of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) and Ki67 were reviewed. The quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI were compared among patients with different immunohistochemical subtype. Results There were no statistically significances in quantitative parameters Ktrans, Kep and Ve among patients with different immunohistochemical subtype(H=5.416,P=0.175;H=4.926,P=0.177;H=4.203,P=0.240, respectively). Ktrans and Kep values were higher in tumors with ER-negative and PR-negative than those with ER-positive and PR-positive. Kepvalue was higher in tumors with HER-2-positive than that with HER-2-negative. There was no significant difference in Ktrans and Ve values between HER-2 positive and HER-2 negative tumors (P>0.05). Ktrans and Kep values in tumors with high Ki67 expression were higher than those with low Ki67 expression. Conclusion Different subtypes of breast cancer can not be predicted by using DCE-MRI quantitative parameters. However, there is some correlation between DCE-MRI quantitative parameters and the prognostic factors. Ktrans and Kep values may reflect the biological behavior, which is related to the prognosis of breast cancer.
Key words:  dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging  prognostic factors  quantitative parameters

您是第5105415位访问者
版权所有《同济大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
主管单位:教育部 主办单位:同济大学
地  址: 上海四平路1239号 邮编:200092 电话:021-65980705 E-mail: yxxb@tongji.edu.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计