引用本文
  • 顾俊,付强强,陆弘逾,等.地西他滨治疗老年急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2016,37(4):93-98, 103.    [点击复制]
  • GU Jun,FU Qiang-qiang,LU Hong-yu,et al.Efficacy and safety of decitabine for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2016,37(4):93-98, 103.   [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 511次   下载 531 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
地西他滨治疗老年急性髓系白血病的疗效和安全性分析
顾俊,付强强,陆弘逾,张静芳,万悦竹,陈梅
0
(同济大学附属杨浦医院血液科,上海 200090;同济大学附属杨浦医院科研管理部,上海 200090)
摘要:
目的 系统评价地西他滨对老年急性髓系白血病(acute myeloid leukemia, AML)治疗效果和相关不良反应。方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Ovid、CochraneLibrary、CNKI、VIP、万方、和CBM等电子数据库,查找地西他滨对比其他方案治疗老年AML的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限均从建库至2015年10月。对符合纳入标准的RCT,由两位评价员按Cochrane系统评价的方法,独立进行资料提取、质量评价并交叉核对后,采用RevMan 5.3进行meta分析。结果 共纳入4个RCT,628例老年AML患者,试验组采用地西他滨,对照组采用其他疗法。Meta分析结果显示,与其他疗法比较,地西他滨治疗老年AML患者的完全缓解率更高(OR=2.44,95% CI:1.46~4.06,P=0.0006),部分缓解率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不良反应方面,地西他滨治疗组的Ⅲ/Ⅳ级粒细胞减少性发热发生率高于其他方案组(OR=1.77,95% CI:1.20~2.61,P=0.004),而两组的Ⅲ/Ⅳ级中性粒细胞减少、Ⅲ/Ⅳ级血小板减少、Ⅲ/Ⅳ级贫血的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 现有研究证据显示,地西他滨治疗老年AML具有一定疗效,不良反应可耐受。
关键词:  地西他滨  急性髓系白血病  老年人  meta分析
DOI:10.16118/j.1008-0392.2016.04.019
投稿时间:2016-01-20
基金项目:上海市卫生和计划生育委员会委级科研项目(20134443)
Efficacy and safety of decitabine for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia
GU Jun,FU Qiang-qiang,LU Hong-yu,ZHANG Jing-fang,WAN Yue-zhu,CHEN Mei
(Dept.of Hematology, Yangpu Hosptial, Tongji University, Shanghai 200090, China;Dept.of Scientific Research Management, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 200090, China)
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of decitabine for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Methods Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) on decitabine in treatment of acute myeloid leukemia was searched from databases of PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM from inception to Oct, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 628 patients were finally included. The trial arm was given decitabine while the control arm was given other therapies. The results of meta-analysis showed that for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia, decitabine produced a better complete remission(CR) rate than other therapies[OR=2.44,95% CI:1.46~4.06,P=0.0006], while the partial remission(PR) rate had no statistically significant difference between two arms(P>0.05). In terms of adverse events, the incidence of grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ febrile neutropenia in decitabine arm was significantly higher than that in other therapies(OR=1.77,95% CI:1.20~2.61,P=0.004). The incidences of grade Ⅲ or Ⅳneutropenia, grade Ⅲor Ⅳthrombocytopenia, and grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ anemia were not statistically different between two arms(P>0.05).Conclusion Current evidence suggests that decitabine achieved a higher CR rate, with comparable hematological side effects for elderly patients with AML.
Key words:  decitabine  acute myeloid leukemia  older patients  meta-analysis

您是第5115543位访问者
版权所有《同济大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
主管单位:教育部 主办单位:同济大学
地  址: 上海四平路1239号 邮编:200092 电话:021-65980705 E-mail: yxxb@tongji.edu.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计