引用本文
  • 何芳.呼吸锻炼联合噻托溴铵治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效观察[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2015,36(1):113-116.    [点击复制]
  • HE Fang.Combination of respiratory training with tiotropium bromide for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2015,36(1):113-116.   [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 416次   下载 402 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
呼吸锻炼联合噻托溴铵治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效观察
何芳
0
(上海中医药大学附属龙华医院中医预防保健科, 上海 200032)
摘要:
目的观察呼吸锻炼联合噻托溴铵对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(chronic dostructive pulmonary disease, COPD)患者临床症状、肺功能的影响。方法将65例稳定期COPD患者按随机数字表随机分为对照组(32例)及治疗组(33例)。对照组给予噻托溴铵1粒/d,吸入治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上增加呼吸锻炼。每组均治疗5周,观察治疗前后相应症状、肺功能(FEV1、FVC、FEV1/FVC)、Borg呼吸困难评分、生活质量评分的变化。结果治疗前,咳嗽、喘促程度的两组组内比较,肺功能FEV1及FEV1/FVC,Borg呼吸困难评分,生活质量评分的治疗组治疗前比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。治疗后,喘促程度、肺功能FEV1及FEV1/FVC)、Borg呼吸困难评分、生活质量评分的组间比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。治疗后,咳嗽、咳痰程度组间比较,肺功能的FVC无统计学差异(P>0.05)。 治疗前、后,治疗组咳嗽、喘促程度、FEV1、FEV1/FVC、Borg呼吸困难评分、生活质量评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组咳嗽、喘促程度差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,治疗组喘促程度、FEV1、FEV1/FVC、Borg呼吸困难评分、生活质量评分改善优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);咳嗽、咳痰、FVC差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 呼吸锻炼联合噻托溴铵能提高稳定期COPD患者的肺功能,明显改善咳嗽、喘促症状。
关键词:  呼吸锻炼  慢性阻塞性肺疾病  症状  肺功能
DOI:10.16118/j.1008-0392.2015.01.025
投稿时间:2014-05-08
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展973计划(2013CB967501)
Combination of respiratory training with tiotropium bromide for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
HE Fang
(Dept. of Prerention of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Care, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China)
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of respiratory training combined with tiotropium bromide for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) in remission period. MethodsSixty-five COPD patients at stable stage were randomized into two groups: 33 patients in respiratory training group received respiratory training with tiotropium bromide treatment for 5 weeks and 32 patients in control group were treated with tiotropium bromide alone. The clinical symptoms, pulmonary function, Borg dyspnea score and the quality of life score were evaluated in two groups. ResultsThe degree of cough, shortness of breath, FEV1, FEV1 / FVC, Borg dypnea score, quality of life score had significant differences before and after treatment in treatment group(P<0.05), while in control group, only the degree of cough and shortness of breath had significant differences before and after treatment(P<0.05). After treatment, shortness of breath, FEV1, FEV1 / FVC, Borg dyspnea score, quality of life score in respiratory training group were better than those in control group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the degree of cough, sputum and the lung function of FVC after treatment between two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionRespiratory training combined with tiotropium bromide treatment can improve clinical symptoms, pulmonary function, Borg dyspnea score and the quality of life score in COPD patients with in stable stage.
Key words:  respiratory training  chronic obstructive pulmonary disease  symptom  pulmonary function

您是第5184557位访问者
版权所有《同济大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
主管单位:教育部 主办单位:同济大学
地  址: 上海四平路1239号 邮编:200092 电话:021-65980705 E-mail: yxxb@tongji.edu.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计