引用本文
  • 李爱武,周彩存,徐建芳,等.长春瑞宾单药与长春瑞宾联合卡铂治疗≥75岁的老年晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床研究[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2012,33(4):57-62.    [点击复制]
  • LI Ai-wu,ZHOU Cai-cun,XU Jian-fang,et al.Vinorelbine versus vinorelbine-carboplatin in treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2012,33(4):57-62.   [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 316次   下载 397 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
长春瑞宾单药与长春瑞宾联合卡铂治疗≥75岁的老年晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床研究
李爱武,周彩存,徐建芳,任胜祥,陈晓霞,朱韧
0
()
摘要:
目的 探讨长春瑞宾与长春瑞宾联合卡铂在治疗≥75岁的老年晚期(Ⅲb或Ⅳ期)非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)中的有效性和安全性。方法 回顾性分析细胞学或组织学确诊的51例≥75岁的初治晚期NSCLC患者,长春瑞宾单药治疗或长春瑞宾联合卡铂治疗,比较两种方案的有效性和安全性。结果 51例患者共接受了105个周期的化疗,平均化疗周期数约为2.1个,其中单药组为1.9个,联合组为2.3个(P=0.295)。两组可评价疗效的患者分别为21例和14例,单药组部分缓解率(partial remission,PR)为9.5%,联合组为28.6%;两组的中位生存时间分别为为7.2个月(95%CI 4.9,9.5)和9.3个月(95%CI 4.3,15.7),1,2年生存率分别为39.7%、10%和45.0%、13.0%(Log Rank P=0.679)。多因素分析提示,相对于功能状态(performancestatus,PS)评分=1的患者,PS=2患者1年生存期率较低(29.1%vs 45.5%,P=0.061)。在安全性方面,两组的药物毒副反应均较轻,无Ⅳ级不良反应,主要的毒副反应是血液学毒性,其中Ⅲ度血液学毒性分别为中性粒细胞下降(6.5%,15.0%),白细胞下降(6.5%,10.0%),贫血(6.5%,5.0%)和血小板下降(3.2%,5.0%),非血液学毒性主要为Ⅰ、Ⅱ度的胃肠道反应,两组间的毒副反应无统计学差异。多因素COX回归分析显示,PS=2和重度合并症的患者可能较PS=0-1和轻度合并症患者的预后差(P=0.061,0.183)。结论 尽管尚无统计学差异,相对于长春瑞宾单药,长春瑞宾联合卡铂方案在治疗≥75岁晚期NSCLC疗效上略有优势;PS评分和合并症状态可能是影响生存期的主要因素。
关键词:  老年  非小细胞肺肿瘤  长春瑞宾  卡铂
DOI:10.3969/j.issn1008-0392.2012.04.013
基金项目:
Vinorelbine versus vinorelbine-carboplatin in treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
LI Ai-wu,ZHOU Cai-cun,XU Jian-fang,REN Sheng-xiang,CHEN Xiao-xia,ZHU Ren
()
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine versus vinorelbine-carboplatin in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) . Methods The clinical characteristics, treatment strategies and survival features of 51 elderly patients (≥75years) with NSCLC admitted between January 2006 to December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. Results The mean therapeutic cycles of vinorelbine and vinorelbine-carboplatin group were 1.9 and 2.3 respectively (P=0.295) . Among 21 and 14 efficacy -evaluable patients in each group, the partial remission (PR) rates were 9.5% and 28. 6% respectively (P=0.191) ; the median survival time were 7. 2 (95% CI: 4. 9, 9.5) months and 9. 3 (95%CI: 4. 3, 15.7) months; and the 1,2-year survival rates were 39.7% ,10% and 45.0% ,13% (Log Rank P=0.679) . Cox regression analysis shows that patients with performance status (PS)=2 and severe comorbidities had a poorer prognosis than those with PS =0-1 and mild comorbidities (P=0.061, 0.183) . No grade 4 hematological toxicity was found, the grade 3 hematological toxicities of two groups were neutropenia (6.5%, 15.0%), leukopenia(6.5% ,10.0% ) , anemia (6.5% ,5.0% ) and thrombopenia (3.2% ,5.0% ) . Only grade 1-2 non-hematological toxicities were recorded. And no differences of toxicity profiles were found between the two groups. Conclusion Compared with single agent, vinorelbine-carboplatin seems to be a feasible treatment option with a favorable toxicity profile for elderly (≥75years) patients with advanced NSCLC. PS status and comorbidities may be the most important prognostic factors.
Key words:  elderly  non-small cell lung cancer  vinorelbine  carboplatin

您是第5120148位访问者
版权所有《同济大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
主管单位:教育部 主办单位:同济大学
地  址: 上海四平路1239号 邮编:200092 电话:021-65980705 E-mail: yxxb@tongji.edu.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计