欢迎访问《同济大学学报（医学版）》编辑部！

引用本文：

王雪英,廖起,彭沪,等.成比例辅助通气与压力支持通气对自主呼吸试验患者效果交叉设计研究[J].同济大学学报（医学版）,2012,33(3):73-77. [点击复制]
WANG Xue-ying,LIAO Qi,PENG Hu,et al.Effects of pressure assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation on spontaneous breathing trial: a cross-over study[J].同济大学学报（医学版）,2012,33(3):73-77. [点击复制]

【打印本页】【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】【查看/发表评论】【下载PDF阅读器】【关闭】

本文已被：浏览 427次下载 409次	码上扫一扫！
成比例辅助通气与压力支持通气对自主呼吸试验患者效果交叉设计研究
王雪英¹,廖起¹,彭沪²,刘煜昊²,王启星²,张翔宇²
0 字体:加大+\|默认\|缩小-
(1. 上海建工医院急诊科,上海 200083;2. 同济大学附属第十人民医院急诊危重病科,上海 200072)

摘要:

目的比较成比例辅助通气(proportional assist ventilation plus,PAV+)与压力支持通气(pressure support ventilation,PSV)两种不同的自主通气模式对患者呼吸、循环系统的影响。方法对所有符合纳入标准的患者,采用自身时照、交叉设计的方法,随机选择通气模式,分别采用PAV+与PSV模式进行30 min SBT,监测并记录患者在SBT前与SBT结束时的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MP)、脉搏氧饱和度(SpO₂)、呼出潮气量(Vte)、平均气道压(MAP)、呼吸浅快指数(RSBI)等参数,以及SBT前后的动脉血气分析等指标。结果 SBT结束时,PAV组和PSV组的呼吸、循环相关参数比较,与PSV组相比,PAV组在Vte较SBT前有所增加,有统计学意义(P＜0.05),PAV组和PSV组增加量分别为(44.25±49.8)ml、(9.25±19.2) ml; PAV组在RSBI显著低于PSV组(P=0.041),PAV组和PSV组分别是(39±10)ml、(53±14)ml.与PSV组相比,PAV组其余指标无显著性差异(P＞0.05).SBT后30 min动脉血气分析结果在两组无显著性差别(P＞0.05)。结论与PSV模式相比较,PAV+模式下,Vte、MV等参数较SBT前有所增加;RSBI在PAV组显著低于PSV组;循环系统两者无显著性差异。

关键词: 自主呼吸试验成比例辅助通气压力支持通气呼吸浅快指数

DOI：10.3969/j.issn1008-0392.2012.03.017

基金项目:上海市卫生局科研课题(2009143)

Effects of pressure assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation on spontaneous breathing trial: a cross-over study

WANG Xue-ying¹,LIAO Qi¹,PENG Hu²,LIU Yu-hao²,WANG Qi-xing²,HANG Xiang-yu²

(1.Dept.of Emergency,Shanghai Jiangong Hospital,Shanghai 200083,China;2.Dept.of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Tenth People’s Hospital,Tongji University,Shanghai 200072,China)

Abstract:

Objective To compare the effects of pressure assist ventilation +（PAV +）mode and pressure support ventilation（PSV）mode on respiration and circulation in patients undergoing spontaneous breathing trial（SBT）.Methods Cross-over design method was applied in this study. All the patients included underwent and completed two SBTs of PAV + and PSV.These two different ventilation modes sequence were set randomly.SBTs were completed in 30 min.Ventilatory and circulatory parameters were monitored and recorded before and after the SBT procedures,including Heart Rate（HR）,mean pressure（MP）,pulse oximetry（SpO₂）,tidal volume（Vte）,minute ventilation（MV）,mean airway pressure（MAP）,rapid shallow breathing index（RSBI）,arterial blood gas analysis（ABG）.Results Comparing to PSV mode,PAV + mode delivered more Vte and MV during the SBT procedures（44.25±49.8 ml vs9.25±19.2 ml,P＜0.05;0.88±0.4 ml vs- 0.71±1.9 ml,P＜0.05,respectively）;PAV + mode has lower RSBI at the end of the 30 min SBT procedures（39±10 ml vs 53±14 ml,P=0.041）.Other respiration,circulation parameters and ABG at baseline and end of SBT between PAV + and PSV modes showed no significant differences（P＞0.05）.Conclusion When patients performed SBT procedures,PAV + mode can deliver more Vte and MV than PAV mode.PAV + mode has lower RSBI at the 30 min of the SBT procedures.

Key words: spontaneous breath trail proportional assist ventilation pressure support ventilation rapid spontaneous breath index